Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HLIT · against 579 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #301 of 580 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)61 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including HLIT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HLIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 557 reported | 0.36× | 0.21× | 41% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 559 reported | 1.32 | 0.72 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 578 reported | 3.05× | 1.83× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 297 | 1.5B USD | 53 | 84 | |
| 298 | 211.9B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 70 | |
| 299 | 33.4B TWD (≈$1.0B) | 53 | 30 | |
| 300 | 49.8B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 53 | 51 | |
| 301 | 1.1B USD | 53 | 46 | |
| 302 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 303 | 7.0B CNY (≈$981M) | 53 | 56 | |
| 304 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 52 | 40 | |
| 305 | 6.2B SEK (≈$619M) | 52 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score