Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hecla Mining Company
How Hecla Mining Company stacks up
HL · against 183 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 184 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including HL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 232.2% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 34.4% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 89.8% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 184 reported | 89.8% | 8.4% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 232.2% | 15.1% | 90% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 183 reported | 34.4% | 2.5% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 5 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.0B AUD (≈$8.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 5 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 5 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score