Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Highwoods Properties, Inc.
How Highwoods Properties, Inc. stacks up
HIW · against 154 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #92 of 155 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including HIW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 29.3% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HIW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HIW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 155 reported | 3.0% | 5.2% | 38% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 29.3% | 9.5% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | -0.1% | 6.2% | 21% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HIW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 2 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 3 | 4.1B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 3 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 96 | 58 | |
| 87 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 90 | 319.2B JPY (≈$2.2B) |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score