Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HIMS · against 225 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #178 of 226 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including HIMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | HIMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 223 reported | -2.5% | 2.5% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | -0.2% | 4.6% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 1.0% | 1.2% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | 5.4% | 24.8% | 10% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 22.0B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 67 | |
| 4 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 178 | 3.3B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 178 | 5.1B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 178 | 4.1B USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 178 | 6.2B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 178 | 6.0B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 178 | 4.7B USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 178 | 8.8B USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 178 | 3.0B USD | 8 | 54 | |
| 178 | 6.0B USD | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score