Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HIMS · against 222 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #223 of 223 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including HIMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HIMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 215 reported | 4.77× | 0.25× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 223 reported | 2.43 | 0.55 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 214 reported | 0.93× | 2.72× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 219 | 3.6B USD | 3 | 43 | |
| 220 | 4.6B USD | 3 | 61 | |
| 221 | 41.9B SEK (≈$4.2B) | 2 | 53 | |
| 222 | 3.0B USD | 1 | 39 | |
| 223 | 6.0B USD | 1 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score