Ranked #112 of 260 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
27 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HIFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Book yield is close to the peer norm. Book yield: 74.6% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.7% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HIFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
HIFS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 262 reported
9.7%
8.6%
65%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 50 reported
Not reported
10.6%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 155 reported
5.2%
7.9%
31%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 262 reported
74.6%
87.4%
38%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
