Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.
How Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. stacks up
HGV · against 326 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #181 of 327 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including HGV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.7% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HGV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HGV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 326 reported | 4.2% | 5.5% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 333 reported | 8.5% | 9.4% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 10.5% | 6.0% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 328 reported | 33.8% | 44.5% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HGV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 175 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 175 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 181 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 49 | 68 | |
| 181 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 | |
| 181 | 3.2B USD | 49 | 46 | |
| 181 | 3.0B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 185 | 400.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 48 | 68 | |
| 185 | 4.6B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 185 | 109.3B TRY (≈$3.3B) | 48 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score