Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
How D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. stacks up
HEPS · against 536 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #438 of 537 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including HEPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HEPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HEPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | Not reported | 4.6% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 548 reported | Not reported | 9.1% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 12.3% | 7.3% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | Not reported | 60.2% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HEPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 438 | 4.4B CNY (≈$621M) | 17 | 52 | |
| 438 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 17 | 35 | |
| 438 | 137.4B JPY (≈$934M) | 17 | 32 | |
| 438 | 656M USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 438 | 1.0B USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 446 | 5.0B CNY (≈$704M) | 16 | 51 | |
| 446 | 3.8B CNY (≈$539M) | 16 | 24 | |
| 446 | 9.8B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 16 | 65 | |
| 446 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 16 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score