Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
How D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. stacks up
HEPS · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #303 of 356 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including HEPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HEPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HEPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | Not reported | 4.3% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | Not reported | 8.4% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 12.3% | 5.3% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | Not reported | 35.8% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HEPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 298 | 4.3B USD | 19 | 39 | |
| 301 | 3.5B USD | 18 | 73 | |
| 301 | 1.4B USD | 18 | 19 | |
| 303 | 656M USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 303 | 1.0B USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 303 | 366M USD | 17 | 14 | |
| 306 | 7.0B USD | 16 | 46 | |
| 306 | 79.4B USD | 16 | 46 | |
| 306 | 1.4B USD | 16 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score