Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HUTCHMED (China) Limited
How HUTCHMED (China) Limited stacks up
HCM · against 348 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #55 of 349 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score43 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including HCM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: -13.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 1110.0% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HCM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HCM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 349 reported | -13.0% | 6.8% | 11% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 201 reported | 1110.0% | 9.8% | 100% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 341 reported | 8.8% | 8.2% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HCM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 52 | 1.9B USD | 87 | 68 | |
| 52 | 1.8B USD | 87 | 80 | |
| 52 | 182.3B INR (≈$2.2B) | 87 | 66 | |
| 55 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 86 | 85 | |
| 55 | 2.3B USD | 86 | 74 | |
| 55 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 55 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 86 | 44 | |
| 55 | 1.9B USD | 86 | 42 | |
| 60 | 8.8B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 85 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score