Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Hackett Group, Inc.
How The Hackett Group, Inc. stacks up
HCKT · against 456 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #100 of 457 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including HCKT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 89% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.6% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HCKT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HCKT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | 4.8% | 1.6% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 474 reported | 10.8% | 4.0% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 9.6% | 0.7% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 21.0% | 45.9% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HCKT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 96 | 7.8B THB (≈$219M) | 84 | 49 | |
| 100 | 3.1B CNY (≈$431M) | 83 | 80 | |
| 100 | 94.5B JPY (≈$643M) | 83 | 54 | |
| 100 | 151M EUR (≈$167M) | 83 | 56 | |
| 100 | 324M USD | 83 | 50 | |
| 100 | 560M EUR (≈$616M) | 83 | 51 | |
| 100 | 629M AUD (≈$415M) | 83 | 57 | |
| 106 | 17.8B TWD (≈$553M) | 82 | 52 | |
| 106 | 20.3B TWD (≈$631M) | 82 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score