Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
How Warrior Met Coal, Inc. stacks up
HCC · against 285 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #170 of 286 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.7% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HCC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 283 reported | 5.2% | 5.2% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 289 reported | 10.7% | 10.5% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 0.1% | 4.4% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 275 reported | 53.8% | 49.9% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HCC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 2 | 3.7B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 98 | 84 | |
| 168 | 20.3B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 53 | 36 | |
| 168 | 45.05T IDR (≈$2.8B) | 53 | 54 | |
| 170 | 695.9B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 52 | 67 | |
| 170 | 3.3B USD | 52 | 59 | |
| 170 | 4.3B USD | 52 | 77 | |
| 170 | 4.0B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 174 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 174 | 36.9B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 51 | 38 | |
| 174 | 39.8B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 51 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score