Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
How Warrior Met Coal, Inc. stacks up
HCC · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 183 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including HCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.1% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: 37.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 441.3% vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HCC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 37.5% | 9.9% | 74% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | 441.3% | 17.1% | 91% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 1.1% | 1.5% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HCC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 12 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 77 | |
| 12 | 3.2B USD | 97 | 64 | |
| 12 | 301M USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 18 | 3.8B USD | 96 | 77 | |
| 18 | 4.3B USD | 96 | 77 | |
| 18 | 1.9B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 18 | 815M USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 18 | 5.8B USD | 96 | 80 | |
| 23 | 84.6B USD | 95 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score