Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
How Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company stacks up
HBB · against 571 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #32 of 572 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score63 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including HBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 21.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 22.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HBB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 563 reported | 13.0% | 3.2% | 92% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 583 reported | 11.5% | 8.3% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 22.1% | 7.1% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 565 reported | 49.4% | 64.1% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HBB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 32 | 32.6B JPY (≈$222M) | 95 | 61 | |
| 32 | 114.5B JPY (≈$778M) | 95 | 78 | |
| 32 | 78.4B JPY (≈$533M) | 95 | 72 | |
| 32 | 573M EUR (≈$631M) | 95 | 53 | |
| 32 | 439M USD | 95 | 85 | |
| 32 | 202M EUR (≈$223M) | 95 | 67 | |
| 39 | 32.7B JPY (≈$222M) | 94 | 62 | |
| 39 | 1.0B MYR (≈$230M) | 94 | 63 | |
| 39 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 94 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score