Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HBAN · against 110 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #100 of 111 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including HBAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | HBAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 84 reported | 8.5% | 10.7% | 40% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 9 reported | Not reported | 13.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 111 reported | 0.8% | 1.1% | 33% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 111 reported | 9.0% | 13.9% | 11% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 115 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 3 | 28.3B USD | 96 | 85 | |
| 4 | 25.0B EUR (≈$27.5B) | 94 | 67 | |
| 4 | 27.2B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 97 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 27 | ||
| 97 | 32.4B EUR (≈$35.7B) | 27 | 28 | |
| 97 | 60.1B CAD (≈$43.9B) | 27 | 19 | |
| 100 | 44.6B EUR (≈$49.1B) | 26 | 65 | |
| 100 | 32.0B USD | 26 | 31 | |
| 100 | 29.8B USD | 26 | 19 | |
| 103 | 63.1B USD | 24 | 67 | |
| 103 | 16.1B USD | 24 | 23 | |
| 105 | 4.95T JPY (≈$33.7B) | 23 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score