Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hafnia Limited
How Hafnia Limited stacks up
HAFN · against 444 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #433 of 445 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score27 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including HAFN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -77.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: -20.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAFN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAFN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 446 reported | -20.5% | 6.5% | 1% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 388 reported | -77.8% | 8.8% | 2% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 440 reported | 5.8% | 6.5% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAFN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 427 | 4.5B USD | 13 | 29 | |
| 427 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 13 | 25 | |
| 431 | 25.2B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 12 | 28 | |
| 432 | 372.8B INR (≈$4.5B) | 11 | 37 | |
| 433 | 5.6B USD | 10 | 50 | |
| 434 | 958.0B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 9 | 31 | |
| 434 | 31.2B DKK (≈$4.7B) | 9 | 39 | |
| 436 | 5.4B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 8 | 39 | |
| 437 | 6.8B USD | 7 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score