Ranked #113 of 268 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
24 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HAFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Book yield is close to the peer norm. Book yield: 83.0% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.1% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
HAFC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 272 reported
9.0%
8.3%
57%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 52 reported
Not reported
10.6%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 163 reported
21.4%
8.0%
87%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 269 reported
83.6%
81.4%
51%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
