Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GWW · against 86 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #16 of 87 · scores higher than 83% of peers · safety percentile 57
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including GWW · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GWW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 84 reported | 0.62× | 0.68× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 86 reported | 1.01 | 0.91 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 86 reported | 2.81× | 1.21× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2.78T INR (≈$33.3B) | 84 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 79 | 53 | |
| 12 | 2.39T THB (≈$67.1B) | 59 | 64 | |
| 13 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 58 | 62 | |
| 14 | 206.3B BRL (≈$37.1B) | 58 | 62 | |
| 15 | 271.0B CNY (≈$37.9B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 16 | 65.8B USD | 57 | 60 | |
| 17 | 47.7B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 18 | 47.2B USD | 55 | 65 | |
| 19 | 265.7B CNY (≈$37.2B) | 53 | 65 | |
| 20 | 387.5B HKD (≈$49.6B) | 53 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score