Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GWRE · against 190 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #121 of 191 · scores higher than 37% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)25 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including GWRE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GWRE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 180 reported | 0.60× | 0.34× | 30% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 182 reported | 1.03 | 1.03 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 190 reported | 1.79× | 1.67× | 57% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 117 | 61.9B CNY (≈$8.7B) | 34 | 49 | |
| 118 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 34 | 63 | |
| 119 | 8.1B USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 120 | 10.6B USD | 33 | 60 | |
| 121 | 13.2B USD | 32 | 53 | |
| 122 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 32 | 37 | |
| 123 | 517.4B TWD (≈$16.0B) | 31 | 58 | |
| 124 | 23.3B USD | 30 | 39 | |
| 125 | 19.4B USD | 30 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score