Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Global Ship Lease, Inc.
How Global Ship Lease, Inc. stacks up
GSL · against 776 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 777 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including GSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 20.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 97% of peers. EBITDA yield: 28.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings yield: 25.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 775 reported | 25.4% | 4.4% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 786 reported | 28.6% | 7.6% | 98% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 188 reported | 20.0% | 4.2% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 777 reported | 134.1% | 52.8% | 92% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GSL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 12.0B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 4 | 112.6B JPY (≈$766M) | 99 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score