Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
3 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including GS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on equity, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.0% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 81% of peers. Return on equity: 17.1% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
GS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 12 reported
Not reported
12.6%
—
—
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 4 reported
Not reported
62.7%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 23 reported
1.0%
0.9%
59%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 23 reported
16.9%
13.1%
73%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 23 reported
82.1%
0.0%
86%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
