Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gold Royalty Corp.
How Gold Royalty Corp. stacks up
GROY · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #30 of 183 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including GROY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 54.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 58.2% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GROY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GROY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 54.5% | 9.9% | 82% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 17.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 58.2% | 1.5% | 95% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GROY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.0B USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 10.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 44.5B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 17.2B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 28 | 20.8B USD | 94 | 76 | |
| 30 | 10.7B USD | 93 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score