Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GRND · against 450 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #414 of 451 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including GRND · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GRND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 440 reported | Not reported | 0.24× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 434 reported | 0.19 | 0.89 | 96% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 447 reported | 1.10× | 1.88× | 15% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 410 | 396.8B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 11 | 54 | |
| 411 | 1.2B USD | 10 | 41 | |
| 412 | 1.2B USD | 10 | 21 | |
| 413 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 10 | 5 | |
| 414 | 2.3B USD | 10 | 67 | |
| 415 | 2.7B USD | 9 | 53 | |
| 416 | 2.5B USD | 9 | 58 | |
| 417 | 1.9B USD | 9 | 53 | |
| 418 | 1.72T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 9 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score