Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Grifols, S.A.
How Grifols, S.A. stacks up
GRFS · against 201 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
79/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #59 of 202 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including GRFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 156.5% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 201 reported | 4.3% | 8.9% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 156.5% | 9.9% | 91% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 194 reported | 7.5% | 9.1% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRFS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 3 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 55 | 3.5B USD | 80 | 75 | |
| 55 | 9.0B USD | 80 | 78 | |
| 55 | 921.9B INR (≈$11.1B) | 80 | 82 | |
| 55 | 10.1B USD | 80 | 61 | |
| 59 | 5.8B USD | 79 | 64 | |
| 59 | 5.2B CHF (≈$5.9B) | 79 | 69 | |
| 61 | 8.7B USD | 78 | 26 | |
| 62 | 488.5B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 77 | 72 | |
| 62 | 7.0B USD | 77 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score