Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Grifols, S.A.
How Grifols, S.A. stacks up
GRFS · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
79/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #152 of 455 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score52 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including GRFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 156.5% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 4.3% | 11.0% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 156.5% | 21.2% | 85% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 7.5% | 11.0% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRFS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 145 | 9.0B USD | 80 | 78 | |
| 145 | 10.1B USD | 80 | 61 | |
| 152 | 449M USD | 79 | 72 | |
| 152 | 13.7B USD | 79 | 45 | |
| 152 | 5.8B USD | 79 | 64 | |
| 152 | 1.5B USD | 79 | 43 | |
| 152 | 374M USD | 79 | 66 | |
| 152 | 646M USD | 79 | 46 | |
| 158 | 1.8B USD | 78 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score