Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Grab Holdings Limited
How Grab Holdings Limited stacks up
GRAB · against 501 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #327 of 502 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score36 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including GRAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.0% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 1.9% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.2% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRAB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 474 reported | 1.0% | 7.4% | 32% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 501 reported | 1.9% | 6.9% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | 2.2% | 3.4% | 42% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 465 reported | 7.7% | 9.2% | 47% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 505 reported | 40.5% | 51.0% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRAB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.84T USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 95.8B USD | 99 | 67 | |
| 1 | 598.2B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 15.6B USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 321 | 302M USD | 34 | 47 | |
| 321 | 24.1B USD | 34 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score