Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GPRK · against 103 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 104 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including GPRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GPRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 99 reported | 1.81× | 0.55× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 102 reported | 0.39 | 0.44 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 105 reported | 1.17× | 1.46× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 77 | 336M USD | 24 | 27 | |
| 78 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 24 | 39 | |
| 79 | 7.1B NOK (≈$678M) | 23 | 28 | |
| 80 | 1.0B USD | 22 | 69 | |
| 81 | 670M USD | 17 | 40 | |
| 82 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 17 | 35 | |
| 83 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 16 | 31 | |
| 84 | 5.1B CNY (≈$715M) | 15 | 11 | |
| 85 | 1.2B USD | 15 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score