Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GPC · against 130 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #84 of 131 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including GPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 129 reported | 1.46× | 0.71× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 132 reported | 0.68 | 0.84 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 1.16× | 1.46× | 33% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 80 | 22.1B EUR (≈$24.3B) | 33 | 29 | |
| 81 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 32 | 58 | |
| 82 | 21.7B USD | 32 | 58 | |
| 83 | 27.1B USD | 31 | 58 | |
| 84 | 17.1B USD | 30 | 32 | |
| 85 | 19.7B USD | 29 | 62 | |
| 86 | 181.9B ZAR (≈$10.0B) | 27 | 53 | |
| 87 | 11.0B EUR (≈$12.1B) | 27 | 42 | |
| 88 | 17.7B USD | 27 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score