Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GP · against 1 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 2 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including GP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | GP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1 reported | -421.4% | -421.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | 4.9% | 3.0% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | -339.3% | -69.3% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1 reported | 263.7% | 263.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B KRW (≈$2M) | 69 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2M USD | 23 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score