Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GP · against 1 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 2 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)1 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including GP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2 reported | 5.82× | 2.94× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2 reported | 1.86 | 0.98 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2 reported | 1.49× | 1.14× | 100% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B KRW (≈$2M) | 66 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2M USD | 2 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score