Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Commercial Corporation
How Gladstone Commercial Corporation stacks up
GOOD · against 226 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #87 of 227 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GOOD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GOOD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GOOD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 244 reported | 2.2% | 5.5% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | 7.7% | 5.6% | 74% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 12.5% | 9.6% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 248 reported | 28.2% | 120.5% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GOOD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 83 | 14.2B TWD (≈$440M) | 70 | 52 | |
| 84 | 633M USD | 69 | 33 | |
| 84 | 1.1B AUD (≈$739M) | 69 | 74 | |
| 86 | 4.7B HKD (≈$597M) | 68 | 73 | |
| 87 | 563M USD | 67 | 45 | |
| 87 | 529M EUR (≈$582M) | 67 | 63 | |
| 87 | 772M AUD (≈$509M) | 67 | 70 | |
| 90 | 536M USD | 66 | 27 | |
| 90 | 816M EUR (≈$898M) | 66 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score