Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acushnet Holdings Corp.
How Acushnet Holdings Corp. stacks up
GOLF · against 284 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #158 of 285 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score41 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GOLF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -4.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 71% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GOLF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GOLF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 285 reported | 8.8% | 5.6% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 251 reported | -4.0% | 7.9% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 283 reported | 4.4% | 5.6% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GOLF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 154 | 3.1B GBP (≈$4.0B) | 55 | 40 | |
| 154 | 4.3B USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 158 | 252.7B INR (≈$3.0B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 158 | 313.1B INR (≈$3.8B) | 54 | 52 | |
| 158 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 158 | 6.2B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 158 | 4.3B USD | 54 | 40 | |
| 163 | 21.0B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 53 | 67 | |
| 163 | 582.6B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 53 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score