Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gogo Inc.
How Gogo Inc. stacks up
GOGO · against 105 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #51 of 106 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GOGO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield and earnings yield than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.3% vs peer median 2.9%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.6% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GOGO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GOGO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | -0.4% | 0.4% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 15.4% | 7.8% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | -7.0% | 7.8% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | 37.1% | 60.1% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GOGO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 4 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 47 | 10.9B THB (≈$307M) | 55 | 49 | |
| 48 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 52 | 76 | |
| 49 | 388M USD | 51 | 29 | |
| 50 | 303M USD | 47 | 34 | |
| 51 | 325M USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 52 | 882M AUD (≈$582M) | 43 | 39 | |
| 53 | 286M CAD (≈$209M) | 37 | 52 | |
| 54 | 324M USD | 34 | 25 | |
| 54 | 649M USD | 34 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score