Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GNTX · against 313 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #36 of 314 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)28 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including GNTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GNTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 304 reported | 0.00× | 0.60× | 99% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 305 reported | 0.85 | 0.79 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 302 reported | 3.04× | 1.48× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 32 | 3.3B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 33 | 86.0B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 84 | 71 | |
| 34 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 84 | 70 | |
| 35 | 250.7B INR (≈$3.0B) | 84 | 70 | |
| 36 | 4.2B USD | 84 | 80 | |
| 37 | 2.7B USD | 83 | 69 | |
| 38 | 706.6B JPY (≈$4.8B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 39 | 15.6B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 83 | 62 | |
| 40 | 397.3B INR (≈$4.8B) | 83 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score