Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Guardian Metal Resources PLC
How Guardian Metal Resources PLC stacks up
GMTL · against 230 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #218 of 231 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including GMTL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -20.2% vs peer median 6.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 96% of peers. Return on assets: -10.3% vs peer median 2.5%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GMTL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GMTL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 210 reported | -20.2% | 3.1% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 223 reported | Not reported | 3.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 230 reported | -10.3% | 0.8% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 224 reported | -18.0% | 1.5% | 15% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 248 reported | 0.0% | 16.0% | 6% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GMTL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 220M GBP (≈$286M) | 98 | 97 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 98 | 95 | |
| 4 | 408M AUD (≈$269M) | 97 | 73 | |
| 4 | 368M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 214 | 249M AUD (≈$164M) | 4 | 2 | |
| 214 | 505M AUD (≈$333M) | 4 | ||
| 218 | 1.1B HKD (≈$145M) | 2 | 3 | |
| 218 | 486M AUD (≈$321M) | 2 | 44 | |
| 218 | 211M USD | 2 | 40 | |
| 218 | 287M USD | 2 | 21 | |
| 218 | 166M USD | 2 | 36 | |
| 218 | 352M USD | 2 | 36 | |
| 224 | 3.0B CNY (≈$419M) | 0 | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score