Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to General Motors Company
How General Motors Company stacks up
GM · against 36 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 37 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 18.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.6% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 2.5% | 3.6% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | 9.0% | 5.5% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 27 reported | 0.8% | 3.8% | 12% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | 80.0% | 12.4% | 97% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 2 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 3 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 71 | 58 | |
| 4 | 39.3B USD | 68 | 53 | |
| 5 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 59 | 69 | |
| 6 | 40.6B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 7 | 77.5B USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 8 | 117.0B USD | 49 | 56 | |
| 8 | 119.7B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 10 | 57.2B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 10 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 44 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score