Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GLW · against 46 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 47 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including GLW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GLW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 44 reported | 0.71× | 0.40× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 46 reported | 1.12 | 1.29 | 71% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 47 reported | 1.81× | 1.73× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 3 | 65.3B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 4 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 80 | 74 | |
| 5 | 185.0B USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 22 | 154.6B USD | 36 | 58 | |
| 23 | 203.4B USD | 33 | 61 | |
| 24 | 88.7B USD | 32 | 48 | |
| 25 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 30 | 58 | |
| 26 | 108.7B USD | 28 | 55 | |
| 27 | 175.6B USD | 26 | 56 | |
| 28 | 5.87T TWD (≈$182.0B) | 25 | 46 | |
| 29 | 203.8B USD | 25 | 56 | |
| 30 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 23 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score