Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.
How Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. stacks up
GLSI · against 272 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #174 of 273 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score100 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including GLSI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -10.1% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -9.6% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.3% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLSI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLSI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 256 reported | -10.0% | -0.6% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 278 reported | -10.1% | 1.5% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | -5.3% | -10.1% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 259 reported | 1.3% | 59.4% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLSI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 174 | 302M USD | 8 | 17 | |
| 174 | 455M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 174 | 375M USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 174 | 221M USD | 8 | 33 | |
| 174 | 234M USD | 8 | ||
| 174 | 207M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 174 | 238M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 174 | 172M USD | 8 | 3 | |
| 174 | 275M USD | 8 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score