Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liberty Capital Corporation
How Liberty Capital Corporation stacks up
GLIBA · against 156 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
3/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #152 of 157 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including GLIBA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 96% of peers. Operating margin: -38.3% vs peer median 8.2%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -9.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: -12.8% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLIBA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLIBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 144 reported | -12.8% | 4.5% | 11% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 155 reported | -38.3% | 6.9% | 4% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 153 reported | -9.6% | 2.0% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 145 reported | -20.8% | 4.1% | 10% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 158 reported | 48.6% | 38.3% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLIBA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 6.3B SEK (≈$635M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 61 | |
| 5 | 598M CHF (≈$688M) | 96 | 59 | |
| 148 | 5.5B CNY (≈$773M) | 6 | 27 | |
| 148 | 3.5B CNY (≈$487M) | 6 | 44 | |
| 150 | 3.8B CNY (≈$534M) | 5 | 21 | |
| 151 | 4.2B CNY (≈$590M) | 4 | 4 | |
| 152 | 905M USD | 3 | 33 | |
| 153 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 2 | 19 | |
| 153 | 648M USD | 2 | 26 | |
| 155 | 916M USD | 0 | 19 | |
| 155 | 1.7B USD | 0 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score