Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GoldMining Inc.
How GoldMining Inc. stacks up
GLDG · against 136 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #103 of 137 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including GLDG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.2% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -22.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -12.6% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLDG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLDG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | Not reported | 1.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | -22.1% | 5.0% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | -12.6% | -2.5% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | 103.0% | 89.7% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLDG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2.0B HKD (≈$262M) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2.3B HKD (≈$288M) | 98 | 46 | |
| 3 | 408M AUD (≈$269M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 103 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 8 | 41 | |
| 103 | 277M USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 103 | 493M BRL (≈$89M) | 8 | 38 | |
| 103 | 294M USD | 8 | 37 | |
| 103 | 155M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 103 | 354M CAD (≈$259M) | 8 | ||
| 103 | 124M USD | 8 | ||
| 103 | 162M USD | 8 | ||
| 103 | 284M CAD (≈$208M) | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score