Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Global-E Online Ltd.
How Global-E Online Ltd. stacks up
GLBE · against 229 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
19/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #210 of 230 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including GLBE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 19?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLBE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLBE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 2.1% | 5.1% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 233 reported | 3.1% | 9.1% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 4.2% | 6.4% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 229 reported | 13.0% | 38.0% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLBE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 207 | 7.6B USD | 20 | 52 | |
| 207 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score