Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Glass House Brands Inc.
How Glass House Brands Inc. stacks up
GLAS · against 259 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #166 of 260 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score95 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including GLAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -31.6% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -16.8% vs peer median 0.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -6.6% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 243 reported | -31.6% | -1.1% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 266 reported | -6.6% | 1.4% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 143 reported | -16.8% | -12.2% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 248 reported | 34.9% | 61.3% | 30% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 166 | 399M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 166 | 301M USD | 8 | ||
| 166 | 302M USD | 8 | 17 | |
| 166 | 375M USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 166 | 221M USD | 8 | 33 | |
| 166 | 234M USD | 8 | ||
| 166 | 207M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 166 | 238M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 166 | 172M USD | 8 | 3 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score