Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Glass House Brands Inc.
How Glass House Brands Inc. stacks up
GLAS · against 260 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #157 of 261 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score31 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including GLAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on assets: -9.3% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on invested capital: -10.9% vs peer median 4.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 74% of peers. Operating margin: -9.1% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 222 reported | -10.9% | -1.6% | 38% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 242 reported | -9.1% | 1.6% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 264 reported | -9.3% | -1.2% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 246 reported | -28.6% | -3.1% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 278 reported | 31.8% | 37.0% | 44% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 3 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 96 | 84 | |
| 155 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 29 | 44 | |
| 155 | 201M USD | 29 | 24 | |
| 157 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 28 | 24 | |
| 157 | 172.4B KRW (≈$124M) | 28 | 26 | |
| 157 | 221M USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 157 | 223M USD | 28 | 34 | |
| 161 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 27 | 18 | |
| 161 | 318M USD | 27 | 26 | |
| 161 | 172M USD | 27 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score