Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Glass House Brands Inc.
How Glass House Brands Inc. stacks up
GLAS · against 226 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 227 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including GLAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: -9.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 28.9% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 239 reported | -9.4% | 3.0% | 23% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 220 reported | 28.9% | 3.8% | 87% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 1 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 5 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 98 | 65 | |
| 71 | 418M USD | 66 | 74 | |
| 73 | 2.9B CNY (≈$408M) | 65 | 37 | |
| 74 | 255M USD | 64 | 36 | |
| 75 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 63 | 84 | |
| 76 | 221M USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 76 | 639M AUD (≈$422M) | 62 | 55 | |
| 78 | 2.7B CNY (≈$377M) | 61 | 77 | |
| 78 | 37.6B JPY (≈$256M) | 61 | 58 | |
| 80 | 198.9B KRW (≈$143M) | 60 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score