Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GLAD · against 142 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #109 of 143 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including GLAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GLAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 120 reported | 0.81× | 0.54× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 136 reported | 0.93 | 0.62 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 138 reported | 1.57× | 2.25× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 105 | 773M USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 106 | 31.7B INR (≈$381M) | 38 | 28 | |
| 107 | 798M USD | 38 | 47 | |
| 108 | 662M USD | 36 | 37 | |
| 109 | 433M USD | 35 | 46 | |
| 110 | 761M USD | 35 | 50 | |
| 111 | 1.3B MYR (≈$289M) | 34 | 49 | |
| 112 | 742M USD | 33 | 39 | |
| 113 | 644M USD | 33 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score