Ranked #80 of 178 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker book yield than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 79% of peers. Book yield: 50.6% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.0% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
GL
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 179 reported
9.5%
8.1%
63%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 52 reported
11.1%
8.7%
61%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 94 reported
10.1%
9.2%
56%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 174 reported
50.5%
75.7%
28%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
