Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GL · against 173 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #24 of 174 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score27 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including GL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | GL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 151 reported | 13.2% | 10.8% | 65% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 22 reported | Not reported | 13.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 174 reported | 3.8% | 1.3% | 86% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 172 reported | 20.9% | 12.5% | 82% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 181 reported | 33.9% | 0.0% | 74% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 11.4B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 14.2B AUD (≈$9.3B) | 98 | 57 | |
| 20 | 8.6B USD | 90 | 68 | |
| 22 | 7.8B GBP (≈$10.2B) | 89 | 42 | |
| 22 | 6.8B EUR (≈$7.4B) | 89 | 48 | |
| 24 | 541.0B TRY (≈$16.2B) | 88 | 78 | |
| 24 | 12.2B USD | 88 | 65 | |
| 24 | 20.5B AUD (≈$13.5B) | 88 | 47 | |
| 27 | 6.1B GBP (≈$8.0B) | 87 | 47 | |
| 27 | 9.4B USD | 87 | 76 | |
| 29 | 12.4B EUR (≈$13.6B) | 86 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score