Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GILT · against 620 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #311 of 621 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)57 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including GILT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GILT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 589 reported | 0.02× | 0.21× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 599 reported | 1.06 | 0.65 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 619 reported | 1.97× | 1.90× | 53% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 5 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 307 | 5.6B CNY (≈$778M) | 59 | 26 | |
| 308 | 12.5B TWD (≈$386M) | 59 | 65 | |
| 309 | 63.1B JPY (≈$429M) | 58 | 76 | |
| 310 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 58 | 71 | |
| 311 | 568M USD | 58 | 66 | |
| 312 | 27.4B TWD (≈$850M) | 58 | 67 | |
| 313 | 3.2B CNY (≈$444M) | 58 | 39 | |
| 314 | 17.8B TWD (≈$553M) | 58 | 52 | |
| 315 | 14.2B TWD (≈$439M) | 58 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score