Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
How Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. stacks up
GILT · against 627 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
44/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #268 of 628 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score70 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including GILT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.2% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 5.6% vs peer median 6.8%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.8% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GILT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GILT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 585 reported | 5.6% | 3.7% | 58% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 623 reported | 5.2% | 3.8% | 55% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 614 reported | 2.8% | 1.4% | 63% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 603 reported | 7.0% | 4.0% | 61% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 628 reported | 30.3% | 26.9% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GILT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 268 | 136.5B JPY (≈$928M) | 44 | 54 | |
| 268 | 76.2B JPY (≈$518M) | 44 | 55 | |
| 268 | 91.4B JPY (≈$621M) | 44 | 53 | |
| 268 | 100.7B JPY (≈$684M) | 44 | 61 | |
| 268 | 568M USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 268 | 785M USD | 44 | 51 | |
| 277 | 1.02T KRW (≈$733M) | 43 | 41 | |
| 277 | 9.5B TWD (≈$294M) | 43 | 56 | |
| 277 | 2.5B CNY (≈$356M) | 43 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score