Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gilead Sciences, Inc.
How Gilead Sciences, Inc. stacks up
GILD · against 20 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 21 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including GILD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GILD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GILD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 21 reported | 5.5% | 7.2% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 21 reported | 1684.2% | 22.1% | 100% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 21 reported | 3.6% | 6.0% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GILD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126.5B USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 2 | 155.7B USD | 73 | 64 | |
| 3 | 162.93T ARS (≈$162.9B) | 72 | 63 | |
| 4 | 116.5B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 5 | 285.2B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 15 | 161.8B USD | 47 | 50 | |
| 16 | 258.2B USD | 44 | 47 | |
| 17 | 363.0B USD | 38 | 47 | |
| 18 | 189.3B USD | 26 | 45 | |
| 18 | 207.7B USD | 26 | 18 | |
| 20 | 356.9B USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 21 | 171.0B USD | 14 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score